Op Ed in the Philadelphia Inquirer

I’ve got an Op Ed in yesterday’s Philadelphia Inquirer. Here’s the complete text:

America’s artists: Canaries in the health-care mine

America’s two million artists understand what it means to be a worker in the 21st century, independent, untethered, and mostly expected to fend for themselves.

So for them, the number of uninsured Americans isn’t an abstract statistic. It’s their life. They are the canaries in the coal mine when it comes to health-care reform.

Independent artists have always had unconventional employment relationships, with high levels of self-employment, episodic work patterns, and roller-coaster incomes. With no access to employer-based coverage, most buy health insurance on the individual market or through trade associations. Outside the shelter of a large employment-based group, they face higher rates, medical underwriting that can deny coverage because of existing conditions, and opaque bureaucracies that strive to avoid paying claims.

At Fractured Atlas, we’ve been working to provide artists with affordable health insurance since 2001. As a nonprofit organization, we help our members understand their coverage options, guide them through the enrollment process, and advocate on their behalf. Navigating the system, with a hodgepodge of state-level regulations and an emphasis on employee groups, makes it unnecessarily difficult to serve our community. Despite our best efforts, thousands of working artists remain uninsured.

President Obama’s reform package offers hope. The foundation of the plan - guaranteed coverage for existing conditions - is an unqualified win. Individual underwriting is rarely an issue for employee-group plans, but we see denials of coverage every day. When a 23-year-old vegetarian dancer can be turned down for coverage because of her eczema, I shudder to contemplate how much wasteful spending goes toward cherry-picking the healthiest customers. We have to put such nonsense behind us.

Artists also stand to benefit from an “individual mandate,” which would require them to buy health insurance or face stiff penalties. Forcing the “young invincibles” to participate in the system will stabilize the risk pool and bring down rates for everyone. It will also reduce unreimbursed emergency care, which increases costs throughout the system. The more libertarian-minded will resent being required to buy an insurance policy, but the benefits justify some amount of paternalism.

There aren’t enough details yet about a so-called public option to know whether this would help our efforts to insure the creative community. An effective public plan must provide stiff competition for private insurers in today’s highly monopolistic markets. When one carrier controls 85 percent of a market, it has little incentive to take risks on a group like ours.

However, any public plan should play by the same rules - risk reserve requirements, coverage mandates, and the like - as its private counterparts. Otherwise, private insurers will be driven out of business and there will be fewer choices and less innovation than exists now.

In addition, comprehensive health reform would create federally regulated, association-based plans. Individuals must have the right to band together via a competent intermediary that can provide education, advocacy, and support. Currently, groups like Fractured Atlas must wrestle with 50 state insurance departments, each with its own regulations and approval processes. We end up with different health plans in different states for our community of 100,000 artists. This reduces bargaining power and limits economies of scale. These problems would disappear if we could provide one plan under a single set of federal rules.

It is imperative that our nation’s health insurance system accommodate the growing mobile, independent workforce. Reform that improves access and affordability for working artists could save the canary, and maybe the rest of us, too.


Tags: , ,

3 Responses to “Op Ed in the Philadelphia Inquirer”

  1. Hairy Carrion:

    Mandates are as stupid as trying to cure homelessness with imposing penalties upon the homeless unless they buy a house. Stupid.

    Mandates do NOT provide access to health care. Health care is NOT insurance. Why don’t you get this?

    The mandates being imposed are a boon, billions of dollars of a boon, for the insurance companies and have nothing to with the quality of health care people on lesser incomes may or may not have access too.

    To support mandated insurance, is a slippery slope, and smells of insurance lobby capitulation.

    Even with the so called public option (which isn’t much of an option when it’s mandated profits for the insurance companies) there will be over 10 Million who CAN’T afford and therefore will slip through the cracks again.

    Single payer is the only honest way to reform the insurance debacle.

    The United States should be looking to other countries such a Switzerland who offer up both single payer, REGULATIONS, and private insurance for those who opt.

    As it stands right now, Americans are being bushwacked into more of nothing much at the expense of our pocketbooks and health and well being.

    Don’t buy into the b.s.

  2. Adam Huttler:

    I agree with you that a single payer system is probably the closest thing to a silver bullet out there. However, I just don’t see it as being remotely feasible politically anytime in the foreseeable future. I try to be a political realist, which means sometimes accepting incremental improvements even if they’re far from perfect.

    The reason you need an individual mandate is that guaranteed issue and community rating regulations can’t work without one. Forcing insurance companies to insure everyone at the same price inevitably means that healthy people are subsidizing unhealthy people - that’s how a risk pool works. But without a mandate, eventually the healthy folks make a rational economic decision to opt out of the system. The risk pool rapidly deteriorates and you end up with a vicious circle of skyrocketing premiums, an increasingly unstable risk pool, and increasing numbers of uninsured. Mandates are the only way to break this cycle, unpalatable as they may be.

  3. Non Medical Insurance:

    Non Medical Insurance…

    Nice blog on Fractured Atlas Blog : Op Ed in the Philadelphia Inquirer It is very informative but I don’t fully agree with it as I have read other online views on the same. It was good to spend evening going through internet on Wednesday . I’ll visit…

Leave a Reply